Guide

About

Home / About

About this site

What this is, and what it isn’t.

A health site asking you to trust it should say plainly who is writing, how it decides what to publish, and where its money comes from. Here is that, including the parts we have not filled in yet.

01

What Your Balance Point is

Your Balance Point is a reading site about energy balance: the relationship between the energy you take in as food and drink, and the energy your body spends staying alive and moving around. It has two parts, and they came from different places.

The library is a set of guides originally written for an Australian audience, in kilojoules. That is why you will see kJ first on many pages. We have not rewritten the science for a US audience; we have put the calorie beside every kilojoule, because they are the same quantity in different units (1 cal ≈ 4.2 kJ).

The GLP-1 hub is new, and mostly unwritten. Semaglutide and tirzepatide have changed what the conversation about weight sounds like, and most of what is published about them is either marketing or panic. We are building a small, sober hub instead. Pages that do not exist yet are marked in progress, so you can see exactly what is missing.


02

Why it exists

Most weight content aimed at adults does one of two things. It sells you something, usually a plan or a prescription. Or it moralises, treating a physiological signal as a character defect and your body as evidence in the case against you.

The arithmetic of energy balance is real and worth understanding. The idea that understanding it should be enough, and that failing to win against your own appetite is a personal failing, is not. Both of those things can be true at once, and almost nobody writes as though they are.

No diets. No guilt. Just balance. We want you to leave this site knowing more than you did, and feeling no worse about yourself.


03

Who is behind it

Your Balance Point is written and edited in-house by our editorial team. We are people who have spent years inside this subject rather than observing it from a distance: tracking our own intake and weight, trying the tools, and in several cases taking the medications we write about.

That is the perspective this site is built on. When we describe what a GLP-1 feels like in the first month, what the nausea is actually like, or how quickly the appetite signal comes back after stopping, we are not summarizing a press release. We are telling you what happened to us and what we heard from other people going through it, and we say which is which.

One thing we will always be straight about: we are not clinicians. Our experience is real, and it is experience of our own bodies, which is not the same as knowing what is right for yours. We can tell you what a drug did to us. Only a prescriber who knows your history can tell you what it is likely to do to you, and we would rather you trust them over us on that question.

You will not see a “medically reviewed” badge anywhere on this site, because no clinician reviews these pages and we are not going to pretend otherwise. What you get instead is a record you can check. We read the trials we cite and we link them. We report group averages as group averages, never as a result you should expect. We mark unwritten pages as unwritten instead of padding them out to look complete. When we get something wrong, we fix it on the page and say that we fixed it.


04

Editorial standards

These are the rules we hold ourselves to, and you can hold any page on this site against them.

We tell you which unit you are reading

Here is a thing we have not finished. Most of the library was written in kilojoules for an Australian audience, and it still is. We are rewriting it calorie-first, page by page, and until a page is done it carries a note at the top saying so. We would rather tell you that than quietly leave you doing arithmetic and pretend it was always this way.

Numbers keep their context

A trial result is quoted with its drug, its dose, its duration and its comparison group, or it is not quoted at all. A bare percentage tells you nothing you can check.

Averages are labeled as averages

Group means are reported as group means, never as an outcome you should expect. Where we cite one, we say plainly that it is not a promise.

Unwritten stays unwritten

Pages that do not exist are marked in progress. We do not publish thin filler to look complete, and we do not link to pages that are not there.

What we will not publish

No before-and-after photographs. No miracle framing, and nothing claiming that a drug melts fat. We will not fabricate an author, invent a reviewer, or attach a “medically reviewed” badge that no clinician has put their name to. We will not use scare tactics about food, and we will not write about bodies in moral language.

On medication specifically: we describe, we do not recommend. We are not a prescriber, we do not know your history, and nothing here can substitute for a conversation with someone who does.

Corrections

If something on this site is wrong, we want to fix it and say that we fixed it. Corrections are made on the page itself, and material corrections are noted rather than quietly edited away.


05

How this site makes money, if it does

This is the question that tells you the most about a health site, so it gets a plain answer rather than a paragraph of hedging. Any revenue arrangement that exists will be named here, on this page, before you encounter it anywhere else on the site.

Your Balance Point earns affiliate commissions. When we link to a telehealth provider that prescribes or supplies GLP-1 medications, and you sign up with them, we may be paid for that referral. You never pay more because you came through us, but we do get paid, and you should read everything we write about a provider with that in mind.

Every provider we have a commercial relationship with is named on the page where the link appears, before you click it. If a page recommends someone and does not disclose the relationship, that is a mistake and we want to hear about it.

The obvious tension is worth naming out loud. We take these medications, we write about taking them, and we are paid when readers go on to buy them. That is a real conflict of interest, and the only useful answer to it is the rules below, which we hold to whether a provider pays us or not.

Rules any arrangement must follow

  • Disclosed on this page, and on any page where it applies, before you click anything.
  • No commercial relationship may determine what we conclude about a treatment.
  • No pay-to-be-recommended placements, ever, in any form.

Things we will not do to fund this

  • Sell prescriptions, run a pharmacy, or take a cut of a medication you buy.
  • Sell your health information, or sell access to you as a lead.
  • Publish sponsored content dressed up as editorial.

06

The medical disclaimer, in full

Your Balance Point publishes general educational information. It is not medical advice. It cannot account for your medical history, the other medicines you take, or anything else that makes you a person rather than an average.

Nothing here is a diagnosis or a treatment recommendation. Talk to a licensed clinician before starting, stopping or changing any treatment, including anything discussed in the GLP-1 hub. If you think you are having a medical emergency, contact emergency services.

Where we quote a clinical trial, we report the figure as published: a group average, over a stated period, in a defined population. It describes what happened to that group. It does not predict what will happen to you.

Get in touch

Found something wrong? Tell us.

Corrections, missing context, a figure that has gone stale, or a page that reads as though it is judging you: all of it is worth an email. We want to know.

Educational, not medical advice

kJ and calories on every page

No fabricated credentials

The conversion, both directions

1 cal ≈ 4.2 kJ

To go from calories to kilojoules, multiply by 4.2

1 kJ ≈ 0.24 cal

To go from kilojoules to calories, divide by 4.2

Food labels are built around a reference day, and the reference differs by country. A US Nutrition Facts label uses 2,000 calories. An Australian label, which is what these guides were written against, uses 8,700 kJ, which works out to about 2,080 calories. Either way it is a reference point for designing the label, not a target handed to you personally.